Q&A session after UST Gay Marriage Debate:
Seminarian (asking a question to the Pro Gay Marriage debater): So, you mentioned earlier that the government shouldn’t necessarily have the right to interfere with people’s personal lives, and you also said that you don’t necessarily oppose polygamous marriages because of that. So, why do you still oppose relationships between a human and an animal?
Pro-Gay Marriage Speaker: Well, the argument was more about the fact that the relationshop has to be between two or more consenting adults, which rules out animals right there. *thinks for a minute* Plus, animals have terrible taste in rings.

UST- OEC Auditorium
Overheard by Stephan?